реферат, рефераты скачать
 

Сравнительные степени прилагательных и наречий (Comparison) Модальные глаголы (Modal Verbs) Цепочки ...


Сравнительные степени прилагательных и наречий (Comparison) Модальные глаголы (Modal Verbs) Цепочки ...

Can, Could, Be able to

Can and could are modal auxiliary verbs. Be able to uses the verb "to be" as a main verb. It is not an auxiliary verb, but we look at it here for convenience.


Can

Can is an auxiliary verb, a modal auxiliary verb. We use "can" to:

  • talk about possibility and ability
  • make requests
  • ask for or give permission

Structure of Can

subject + can + main verb

The main verb is always the bare infinitive (infinitive without "to").

 

subject

auxiliary verb

main verb


+

I

can

play

tennis.

-

He

cannot

play

tennis.

can't

?

Can

you

play

tennis?

Notice that:

Use of Can

can: Possibility and Ability

We use can to talk about what is possible, what we are able or free to do:

Normally, we use can for the present. But it is possible to use can when we make present decisions about future ability.

  1. Can you help me with my homework? (present)
  2. Sorry. I'm busy today. But I can help you tomorrow. (future)

can: Requests and Orders

We often use can in a question to ask somebody to do something. This is not a real question - we do not really want to know if the person is able to do something, we want them to do it! The use of can in this way is informal (mainly between friends and family):

can: Permission

We sometimes use can to ask or give permission for something:

  1. Can I smoke in this room?
  2. You can't smoke here, but you can smoke in the garden.

(Note that we also use could, may, might for permission. The use of can for permission is informal.)

Could

Could is an auxiliary verb, a modal auxiliary verb. We use "could" to:

Structure of Could

subject + could + main verb

The main verb is always the bare infinitive (infinitive without "to").


subject

auxiliary verb

main verb


+

My grandmother

could

speak

Japanese.

-

She

could not

speak

Chinese.

couldn't

?

Could

your grandmother

speak

Japanese?

Notice that:

Use of Could

could: Past Possibility or Ability

We use could to talk about what was possible in the past, what we were able or free to do:

We use could (positive) and couldn't (negative) for general ability in the past. But when we talk about one special occasion in the past, we use be able (positive) and couldn't (negative). Look at these examples:


Past

General

Specific Occasion

+

My grandmother could speak Spanish.

A man fell into the river yesterday. The police were able to save him.

-

My grandmother couldn't speak Spanish.

A man fell into the river yesterday. The police couldn't save him.

could: Requests

We often use could in a question to ask somebody to do something. The use of could in this way is fairly polite (formal):

Be able to

Although we look at be able to here, it is not a modal verb. It is simply the verb "to be" plus an adjective (able) followed by the infinitive. We look at "be able to" here because we sometimes use it instead of "can" and "could". We use "be able to":

Structure of Be able to

The structure of be able to is:

subject + be + able + infinitive


subject

be
main verb

able
adjective

infinitive

+

I

am

able

to drive.

-

She

is not

able

to drive.

isn't

?

Are

you

able

to drive?

Notice that be able to is possible in all tenses, for example:

Notice too that be able to has an infinitive form:

Use of Be able to

be able to: ability

We use be able to to express ability. "Able" is an adjective meaning: having the power, skill or means to do something. If we say "I am able to swim", it is like saying "I can swim". We sometimes use "be able to" instead of "can" or "could" for ability. "Be able to" is possible in all tenses—but "can" is possible only in the present and "could" is possible only in the past for ability. In addition, "can" and "could" have no infinitive form. So we use "be able to" when we want to use other tenses or the infinitive. Look at these examples:

 

Have To (objective obligation)

We often use have to to say that something is obligatory, for example:

Structure of Have To

"Have to" is often grouped with modal auxiliary verbs for convenience, but in fact it is not a modal verb. It is not even an auxiliary verb. In the "have to" structure, "have" is a main verb. The structure is:

subject + auxiliary verb + have + infinitive (with "to")

Look at these examples in the simple tense:

 

subject

auxiliary verb

main verb "have"

infinitive (with "to")

 

+

She


has

to work.


-

I

do not

have

to see

the doctor.

?

Did

you

have

to go

to school?

Use of Have To

In general, "have to" expresses impersonal obligation. The subject of "have to" is obliged or forced to act by a separate, external power (for example, the Law or school rules). "Have to" is objective. Look at these examples:

In each of the above cases, the obligation is not the subject's opinion or idea. The obligation is imposed from outside.

We can use "have to" in all tenses, and also with modal auxiliaries. We conjugate it just like any other main verb. Here are some examples:


subject

auxiliary verb

main verb "have"

infinitive


past simple

I


had

to work

yesterday.

present simple

I


have

to work

today.

future simple

I

will

have

to work

tomorrow.

present continuous

She

is

having

to wait.


present perfect

We

have

had

to change

the time.

modal (may)

They

may

have

to do

it again.


 

 

Must (subjective obligation)

We often use must to say that something is essential or necessary, for example:

Structure of Must

"Must" is a modal auxiliary verb. It is followed by a main verb. The structure is:

subject + must + main verb

The main verb is the base verb (infinitive without "to").

Look at these examples:

subject

auxiliary verb
"must"

main verb

 

I

must

go

home.

You

must

visit

us.

We

must

stop

now.

 

Use of Must

In general, "must" expresses personal obligation. "Must" expresses what the speaker thinks is necessary. "Must" is subjective. Look at these examples:

In each of the above cases, the "obligation" is the opinion or idea of the person speaking. In fact, it is not a real obligation. It is not imposed from outside.

We can use "must" to talk about the present or the future. Look at these examples:

There is no past tense for "must". We use "have to" to talk about the past.







Must Not (prohibition)

We use must not to say that something is not permitted or allowed, for example:

Structure of Must Not

"Must" is an auxiliary verb. It is followed by a main verb. The structure for "Must Not" is:

The Main Verb is the base verb (infinitive without "to").

"Must Not" is often contracted to "mustn't".

Look at these examples:

subject

auxiliary "Must" + "Not"

main verb

 

I

mustn't

forget

my keys.

You

mustn't

disturb

him.

Students

must not

be

late.

NB: like all auxiliary verbs, "must" cannot be followed by an infinitive. So, we say:

Use of Must Not

"Must Not" expresses prohibition - something that is not permitted, not allowed. The prohibition can be subjective (the speaker's opinion) or objective (a real law or rule). Look at these examples:

We use "Must Not" to talk about the present or the future:

We cannot use "Must Not" for the past. We use another structure to talk about the past, for example:

Shall and Will

People may sometimes tell you that there is no difference between shall and will, or even that today nobody uses shall (except in offers such as "Shall I call a taxi?"). This is not really true. The difference between shall and will is often hidden by the fact that we usually contract them in speaking with 'll. But the difference does exist.

The truth is that there are two conjugations for the verb will:

1st Conjugation (objective, simple statement of fact)


Person

Verb

Example

Contraction

Singular

I

shall

I shall be in London tomorrow.

I'll

you

will

You will see a large building on the left.

You'll

he, she, it

will

He will be wearing blue.

He'll

Plural

we

shall

We shall not be there when you arrive.

We shan't

you

will

You will find his office on the 7th floor.

You'll

they

will

They will arrive late.

They'll

 

2nd Conjugation (subjective, strong assertion, promise or command)


Person

Verb

Example

Contraction

Singular

I

will

I will do everything possible to help.

I'll

you

shall

You shall be sorry for this.

You'll

he, she, it

shall

It shall be done.

It'll

Plural

we

will

We will not interfere.

We won't

you

shall

You shall do as you're told.

You'll

they

shall

They shall give one month's notice.

They'll

It is true that this difference is not universally recognized. However, let those who make assertions such as "Americans never use 'shall'" peruse a good American English dictionary, or many American legal documents, which often contain phrases such as:

Note that exactly the same rule applies in the case of should and would. It is perfectly normal, and somewhat more elegant, to write, for example:

·   I should be grateful if you would kindly send me your latest catalogue.

Ten sentences:

1)                 Children have to go to school.

2)                 I must go to the university.

3)                 People mustn’t drive a car when they drink alcohol.

4)                 I needn’t do math today, I can do it later.

5)                 I should study harder before exams.

6)                 Elephants and mice can’t fly.

7)                 I could play snooker much better two years ago than I can now.

8)          I can’t have made a mistake in my calculations because I used a calculator.

9)          Can you run 100 meters in 5.5 seconds? 10)

10)Students mustn’t eat or drink during the lection.

Texts:

Combinatorial mathematics.

Specialists in a broad range of fields have to deal with problems that involve combinations made up of letters, numbers or any other objects.

The field of mathematics that studies problems of how many different combinations can be built out of a specific number of objects is called combinatorial mathematics (combinatorics).

This branch of mathematics has its origin in the 16th century, in the gambling games that played such a large part in high society in those times. These games gave the initial impetus to develop combinatorial mathematics and the theory of probability.

Italian and French mathematicians were the first to enumerate the various combinations achieved in games of dice. Further advances in the theory of combinations were connected with the names of German scientists.

In recent years combinatorial mathematics has seen extensive developments associated with grater interest in problems of discrete mathematics. Combinatorial methods can be employed in solving transport problems, in particular scheduling; the scheduling of production facilities and of the sale of goods. Links have been established between combinatorics and problems of linear programming, statistics, etc. Combinatorial methods are used in coding and decoding and in the solution of other problems of information theory.

The combinatorial approach also plays a significant role in purely mathematical problems such as the theory of groups and their representations, in the study of the main principles of geometry, some branches of algebra, etc.


Probability.

Probability is a mathematical expression of the likelihood of an event. Every probability is a fraction. The largest probability can be 1. The smallest probability can be is 0, meaning that it’s something that cannot happen. You can find the probability that something will not happen by subtracting the probability that it will happen from 1. For example, if the weatherman tells you that there is a 0.3 probability of rain today, then there must be a 0.7 probability that it won’t rain.






 





ИНТЕРЕСНОЕ



© 2009 Все права защищены.