History of the USA
p>
Domestic Politics: 1815-46
In a nationalist frame of mind at the end of the War of 1812, Congress
chartered the Second Bank of the United States in 1816, erected the first
protective tariff (see TARIFF ACTS), and supported internal improvements
(roads and bridges) to open the interior. President James MONROE presided
(1817-25) over the so-called Era of Good Feelings, followed by John Quincy
ADAMS (1825-29).
Chief Justice John MARSHALL led the Supreme Court in a crucial series of
decisions, beginning in 1819. He declared that within its powers the
federal government could not be interfered with by the states (MCCULLOCH V.
MARYLAND) and that regulation of interstate and international commerce was
solely a federal preserve (GIBBONS V. OGDEN and BROWN V. MARYLAND). In
1820, in the MISSOURI COMPROMISE, Congress took charge of the question of
slavery in the territories by declaring it illegal above 36 deg 30 min in
the huge region acquired by the Louisiana Purchase. Witnessing the Latin
American revolutions against Spanish rule, the American government in 1823
asserted its paramountcy in the Western Hemisphere by issuing the MONROE
DOCTRINE. In diplomatic but clear language it stated that the United States
would fight to exclude further European extensions of sovereignty into its
hemisphere.
During the presidency of Andrew JACKSON (1829-37), a sharp bipolarization
occurred again in the nation's politics. Of Scots-Irish descent, Jackson
hated the English, and he was, in turn, as thoroughly disliked by New
Englanders, who thought him violent and barbaric. He made enemies in the
South, as well, when in 1832 South Carolina, asserting superior STATE
RIGHTS, attempted to declare null and void within its borders the tariff of
1828 (see NULLIFICATION). In his Nullification Proclamation (1832), Jackson
declared that the federal government was supreme according to the
Constitution. He skillfully outmaneuvered the South Carolinians, forcing
them to relent. In 1832 he vetoed the rechartering of the Second Bank of
the United States on the grounds that it caused the booms and busts that so
alarmed the country and that it served the wealthy while exploiting the
farmers and working people. To oppose him, the old Federalist coalition was
reborn in the form of the American WHIG PARTY. With a DEMOCRATIC PARTY
emerging behind Jackson and embodying the old Jeffersonian Democratic-
Republican coalition, two-party rivalries appeared in every state. By the
1840s modern mass political parties, organized down into every ward and
precinct, had appeared.
Led by Henry CLAY and Daniel WEBSTER, the Whigs called for protective
tariffs, a national bank, and internal improvements to stimulate the
economy. Moralists in politics, they also demanded active intervention by
state governments to maintain the sanctity of the Sabbath, put down
alcoholic beverages, and "Americanize" the immigrants in the public
schools. Yankees, who by now had migrated in great numbers into the
Midwest, leaned strongly toward the Whigs. Many southerners admired Yankee
ways and tended to vote for Whig candidates, too.
Democrats continued to condemn banks and tariffs as sources of corruption
and exploitation, and in Jefferson's tradition insisted on cultural laissez-
faire, the freedom of people to live as they desired. The minority out-
groups--Irish Catholics and Germans--concurred, voting strongly Democratic
in order to ward off the imposition of Yankee morals. During the presidency
of Martin VAN BUREN (1837-41), Democrats succeeded in entirely separating
banking and government in the INDEPENDENT TREASURY SYSTEM, by which the
government stored and controlled its own funds. A brief Whig interlude
under William Henry HARRISON (1841) and John TYLER (1841-45) was followed
by the presidency of the Democrat James K. POLK (1845-49), who in the
Walker Tariff (1846) brought the United States closer to a free-trade
basis.
Growing Sectional Conflicts
President Polk's war with Mexico ripped open the slavery question again.
Was it to be allowed in the new territories? The WILMOT PROVISO (1846),
which would have excluded slavery, became a rallying point for both sides,
being voted on again and again in Congress and successfully held off by
southerners. Abolitionism, led by William Lloyd GARRISON and others and now
strong in many northern circles, called for the immediate emancipation of
slaves with no compensation to slaveowners. Most northern whites disliked
blacks and did not support abolition; they did want to disallow slavery in
the territories so they could be preserved for white settlement based on
northern ideals: free labor, dignity of work, and economic progress.
In 1848 northerners impatient with both of the existing parties formed the
FREE-SOIL PARTY. By polling 300,000 votes for their candidate, Martin Van
Buren, they denied victory to the Democrats and put the Whig Zachary TAYLOR
in the White House (1849-50; on his death Millard FILLMORE became
president, 1850- 53). The COMPROMISE OF 1850 seemed to settle the slavery
expansion issue by the principle of POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, allowing the
people who lived in the Mexican cession to decide for themselves. A strong
FUGITIVE SLAVE LAW was also passed in 1850, giving new powers to
slaveowners to reach into northern states to recapture escaped slaves.
THE CIVIL WAR ERA
As the 1850s began, it seemed for a time that the issue of slavery and
other sectional differences between North and South might eventually be
reconciled. But with the westward thrust of the American nation, all
attempts at compromise were thwarted, and diverging economic, political,
and philosophical interests became more apparent. The resulting civil war
transformed the American nation.
Political Fragmentation
In 1854 the KANSAS-NEBRASKA ACT threw open the huge unorganized lands of
the Louisiana Purchase to popular sovereignty, repealing the Missouri
Compromise line of 1820. The North exploded in rage. Thousands defected
from the Whig party to establish a new and much more antisouthern body (and
one wholly limited to the northern states), the REPUBLICAN PARTY. The
Republicans were aided by an enormous anti-Catholic outburst under way at
the same time, aimed at the large wave of Irish Catholic immigration. Anti-
Catholicism was already draining away Whigs to a new organization, the
American party, soon known as the KNOW-NOTHING PARTY. When in 1856 it
proved unable to hold together its members, north and south, because of
disagreements over slavery, the anti-Catholics joined the Republicans.
In Kansas civil war broke out between pro-slavery and anti- slavery
advocates, as settlers attempted to formalize their position on the
institution prior to the territory's admission as a state. The Democratic
presidents Franklin PIERCE (1853-57) and James BUCHANAN (1857-61) appeared
to favor the pro-slavery group in Kansas despite its use of fraud and
violence. In 1857 the Supreme Court, southern dominated, intensified
northern alarm in its decision in the case of DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD. The
Court ruled that Congress had no authority to exclude slavery from the
territories and thus, that the Missouri Compromise line had been
unconstitutional all along. Thousands of northerners now became convinced
that a "slave conspiracy" had infiltrated the national government and that
it intended to make slavery a nationwide institution.
In 1860 the political system became completely fragmented. The Democrats
split into northern and southern wings, presenting two different candidates
for the presidency; the small CONSTITUTIONAL UNION PARTY attempted to rally
the former Whigs behind a third. The Republicans, however, were able to
secure the election of Abraham LINCOLN to the White House.
Southerners had viewed the rise of the Yankee-dominated Republican party
with great alarm. They were convinced that the party was secretly
controlled by abolitionists (although most northerners detested the
abolitionists) and that Yankees believed in using government to enforce
their moralistic crusades. In 1859, John BROWN led a raid on the federal
arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Va., hoping to incite a slave insurrection. His
action--and his subsequent deification by some northerners- -helped
persuade southerners that emancipation of the slaves, if northerners
obtained control of the country, was sooner or later inevitable.
Secession
Southern leaders had threatened to leave the Union if Lincoln won the
election of 1860. Many South Carolinians, in particular, were convinced
that Republican-sponsored emancipation would lead to bloody massacres as
blacks sought vengeance against whites. In order to prevent this horror
South Carolina seceded in December 1860, soon after the victory of Lincoln,
an undeniably sectional candidate; it was optimistic about the eventual
outcome of its action. Before Lincoln's inauguration (March 1861) six more
states followed (Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and
Texas). In February their representatives gathered in Montgomery, Ala., to
form the CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA. On Apr. 12, 1861, when President
Lincoln moved to reprovision the federal troops at FORT SUMTER, in
Charleston Harbor, Confederate shore batteries launched a 34-hour battering
of the installation, forcing its surrender. The U.S. CIVIL WAR had begun.
The War between the States
Lincoln moved swiftly. On April 15 he called the remaining states to
provide 75,000 troops to put down the Confederacy; Virginia, Arkansas,
North Carolina, and Tennessee reluctantly seceded. The capital of the
Confederacy moved to Richmond. On July 21, 1861, the first major battle
between Union and Confederate forces occurred--at Bull Run (see BULL RUN,
BATTLES OF), south of Washington, D.C.--resulting in a dramatic southern
victory. Thereafter, both sides settled down to a long conflict.
It became an immense struggle. With a total U.S. population of fewer than
32 million, the number of dead reached 620,000 (360,000 northerners out of
an army of about 1.5 million and 260,000 southerners in an army of about 1
million). In contrast, during World War II, when the American population
was 135 million and its military forces fought for 4 years throughout the
world, the total dead reached 400,000. In 1861 about 22 million people
lived in the North, as against some 9 million people in the South, of whom
3.5 million were black. Although the North possessed a vigorous system of
industry and a well-developed railroad network, Europeans were highly
skeptical of a northern victory because the Confederacy was practically as
large as Western Europe and fought with a determined passion for its
independence. The North had to invade and defeat the opposition in order to
win; the South had only to defend its borders. The conflict was not so
uneven as it seemed.
Lincoln launched an all-out effort: he declared a naval blockade of the
Confederacy; worked hard to maintain the loyalty of the slaveholding border
states (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri); invaded Tennessee to
gain a base of power in the heart of the Confederacy; cut the South in two
by taking the Mississippi River; and looked for a general who could win.
This last task took him 2 years. Gen. George B. MCCLELLAN proved
disappointingly conservative, and his successors were bumblers. After Gen.
Ulysses S. GRANT won major victories in the western theater, Lincoln
brought him to Washington in 1864 to face the brilliant Confederate
commander, Robert E. LEE.
By mid-1863 the South was in desperate straits, lacking both food and
supplies. A great northward thrust was turned back at Gettysburg, Pa., in
July of that year (see GETTYSBURG, BATTLE OF). Thereafter, Grant mounted a
relentless campaign that hammered down toward Richmond, at hideous cost in
casualties. Union Gen. William T. SHERMAN, meanwhile, was slashing through
Georgia to the sea, leaving a wide swath of total destruction, and then
turning northward through the Carolinas. By April 1865, Grant had finally
rounded Lee's flank, and on the 9th of that month, Lee surrendered at
APPOMATTOX COURT HOUSE. Confederate president Jefferson DAVIS intended to
fight on, but it was hopeless. The Civil War was over.
A Nation Transformed: The North
The war had transformed both North and South. On Jan. 1, 1863, Lincoln had
issued his EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION, declaring slavery dead wherever
rebellion existed (in the border states, it was terminated by later local
action). In addition, the enormous war effort taught the North lessons in
modern organization and the use of large corporations. In Washington the
Republican majority enacted a classically Hamiltonian program: high
protective tariffs, lavish aid to capitalists to build railroads and
exploit natural resources, free homestead grants for settlers, and banking
and currency legislation that created one national system of paper money.
The MORRILL ACT of 1862 provided grants of land for the establishment of
land- grant universities in each state to train the agriculturalists,
engineers, and other professionals needed to run an industrialized economy.
The two-party system survived in the North despite the war. Democrats never
sank below 40 percent of the vote because many northerners opposed the
conflict, or at least Republican policies. In the DRAFT RIOTS of 1863,
Irish Catholics and other New Yorkers fiercely protested the new
conscription law, which seemed a special hardship to poor people. The
rioters, as well as many other northerners, were hostile toward abolition;
they feared that Republican policies would send hordes of freed slaves
northward to compete for jobs. Democrats also opposed the powerful
centralizing tendencies of the programs pushed by the Republicans, as well
as their aid to capitalists.
Reconstruction
A week after Appomattox, Lincoln was assassinated. Now Andrew JOHNSON
assumed office and moved quickly to establish a plan for RECONSTRUCTION. He
asked southern whites only to repudiate debts owed by the Confederacy,
declare secession null and void, and ratify the 13TH AMENDMENT (which
declared slavery illegal). When Congress convened in December 1865, newly
elected southerners were already on the scene waiting to be admitted to
their seats. Many of them had been elected on the basis of BLACK CODES,
established in the southern states in 1865-66 to restore a form of quasi-
slavery. To the shocked and angered North, it seemed that the sufferings
endured in the war had been in vain: politics as before the war--only now
with a powerful southern Democratic bloc in Congress--would resume.
The Republican majority in Congress refused to admit southern legislators
to their seats until a congressional committee reexamined the entire
question of Reconstruction. Soon, Radical Republicans (those who wished to
use the victory as an opportunity to remake the South in the Yankee image)
were in open conflict with Johnson. He attempted to terminate the
FREEDMEN'S BUREAU (an agency established in 1865 to aid refugees) and to
veto legislation aimed at protecting the civil rights of former slaves (see
CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS). In the congressional election of 1866 a huge majority
of Republicans was elected, and the Radicals gained a precarious
ascendancy. Senator Charles SUMNER of Massachusetts and Representative
Thaddeus STEVENS (New England-born) of Pennsylvania were among the leaders
of the Radical cause.
The 14TH AMENDMENT (enacted in 1866; ratified in 1868) made all persons
born or naturalized in the country U.S. citizens and forbade any state to
interfere with their fundamental civil rights. In March 1867 all state
governments in the South were terminated and military occupation
established. Federal commanders were charged with reconstructing southern
governments through constitutional conventions, to which delegates were to
be elected by universal male suffrage. After a new state government was in
operation and had ratified the 14th Amendment, its representatives would be
admitted to Congress. In February 1868 an impeachment effort sought
unsuccessfully to remove President Johnson from office.
The Republican majority in Congress made no significant effort to create
social equality for blacks, but only to give them the vote and to ensure
them equal protection under the law (trial by jury, freedom of movement,
the right to hold office and any employment, and the like). This political
equality would give blacks an equal start, Republicans insisted, and they
would then carry the burden of proving themselves equal in other ways. Yet
Republicans well knew that antiblack attitudes persisted in the North as
well as in the South. Until ratification (1870) of the 15TH AMENDMENT,
which made it illegal to deny the vote on the grounds of race, most
northern states refused blacks the vote.
A Nation Transformed: The South
Like the North, the South was transformed by the Civil War and its
aftermath. Southerners had learned lessons in the effectiveness of a strong
central government and realized the impossibility of continuing the old
ways of the antebellum period. Former Whigs in the South, often called
Conservatives, pushed eagerly to build industry and commerce in the Yankee
style. Meanwhile, reconstructed southern state governments enacted many
reforms, establishing free public schools for all, popular election of all
officials, more equitable taxes, and more humane penal laws.
Republican Ulysses S. Grant was elected president in 1868 with electoral
votes gained in occupied southern states. Democrats alleged that Radical
Reconstruction was not genuinely concerned with aiding black people, but
with using southern black votes to keep the Republicans in power in
Congress and to retain their protective tariffs and other aids to
industrialists. When evidence of corruption surfaced during the Grant
administration, Democrats declared that it proved that the outcome of
Republican friendliness to capitalists was graft and plunder.
By 1870 the antisouthern mood that had supported Radical Reconstruction had
faded, as had the surge of concern for southern blacks. New domestic
problems were pushing to the fore. A resurgence of white voting in the
South, together with the use of violence to intimidate blacks and their
white sympathizers, brought southern states back into Democratic hands.
Northerners, awakened to economic questions by the great depression that
began in 1873 and lasted for 5 years, tacitly agreed to return the race
issue to the control of southern whites.
After the disputed election of 1876, amid evidence of electoral corruption,
the Republican presidential candidate promised to withdraw the last federal
occupation troops from the South. The election was decided by a
congressional electoral commission, and Rutherford B. HAYES became
president. As promised, he withdrew (1877) the troops; Reconstruction was
over.
THE GILDED AGE
The era known as the GILDED AGE (1870s to 1890s) was a time of vigorous,
exploitative individualism. Despite widespread suffering by industrial
workers, southern sharecroppers, displaced American Indians, and other
groups, a mood of optimism possessed the United States. The theories of the
English biologist Charles Darwin--expounded in The Origin of Species (1859)-
-concerning the natural selection of organisms best suited to survive in
their environment began to influence American opinion. Some intellectuals
in the United States applied the idea of the survival of the fittest to
human societies (SOCIAL DARWINISM) and arrived at the belief that
government aid to the unfortunate was wrong.
Industrialization and Large-Scale Exploitation of NaturalResources
During the Gilded Age ambitious and imaginative capitalists ranged the
continent looking for new opportunities. Business lurched erratically from
upswings to slumps, while the country's industrial base grew rapidly.
Factories and mines labored heavily through these years to provide the raw
materials and finished products needed for expansion of the railroad
system. In 1865 (as construction of the first TRANSCONTINENTAL RAILROAD was
underway; completed 1869) approximately 56,000 km (35,000 mi) of track
stretched across the United States; by 1910 the total reached about 386,000
km (240,000 mi) of interconnected uniform-gauge track. By 1890 the United
States contained one-third of the world's railroad trackage.
After new gold and silver discoveries in the late 1850s, until about 1875,
individual prospectors explored the western country and desert basins in
search of mineral riches. Then mining corporations took over, using hired
laborers and eastern- trained engineers. Indians were either brutally
exterminated or placed on small reservations. Warfare with the Great Plains
Indians broke out in 1864; these INDIAN WARS did not entirely subside until
after the slaughtering of the buffalo herds, the basis of Indian life,
which had occurred by the mid-1880s. Through the DAWES ACT of 1887, which
forced most Indians to choose 160-acre (65-ha) allotments within their
reservations, reformers hoped to break down tribal bonds and induce Indians
to take up sedentary agriculture. Unallocated reservation lands were
declared surplus and sold to whites.
Cattle ranching was the first large-scale enterprise to invade the Great
Plains beginning in the late 1860s. By the 1880s, however, the open range
began to give way to fenced pastureland and to agriculture, made possible
by the newly invented barbed- wire fence and by "dry farming," a technique
of preserving soil moisture by frequent plowing. Millions of farmers moved
into the high plains west of the 100th meridian. So huge was their grain
output that slumping world prices beginning in the mid- 1880s put them into
severe financial straits. Meanwhile, the vast continental sweep between
Kansas and California became filled with new states.
By the early 1900s the nation's economy, tied together by the railroads
into a single market, was no longer composed primarily of thousands of
small producers who sold to local markets. Rather, it was dominated by a
small number of large firms that sold nationwide and to the world at large.
With great size, however, came large and complex problems. In 1887,
Congress created the INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION to curb cutthroat
competition among the railroads and to ensure that railroad rates were
"reasonable and just." In 1890, on the other hand, Congress attempted to
restore competition through passage of the SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST ACT, which
declared illegal trusts and other combinations that restrained trade. The
U.S. Supreme Court favored laissez-faire and consistently blocked both
federal and state efforts to regulate private business. The so-called
robber barons and their immense fortunes were practically unscathed as they
exploited the nation's natural resources and dominated its economic life.
Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6